呼啸山庄写的人太多了吧，要是本科论文的话就没关系，写成什么样都能过。我还是觉得做作家论好一些，也容易答辩，如果你嫌烦的话，可以做诗歌。
学术堂整理了十五个英语文学方向的论文选题供大家进行参考： 1、解读《麦田里的守望者》中霍尔顿的心理世界 Psychological study of Holiden’s image in the Catcher in the Rye 2、浅析《卡斯特桥市长》男主人公的悲剧命运 An Analysis of the Tragic Fate of Hero in the Mayor of Caster bridge 3、浅析《红字》中的象征主义 An Analysis of Symbolism in The Scarlet Letter 4、从女性主义角度解读《贵妇画像》 A Feminist Approach to The Portrait of A Lady 5、浅析《嘉莉妹妹》中摇椅的象征意义 An Analysis of the Symbol of Rocking Chair in Sister Carrie -the Up and Down of Life 6、浅析《飘》中斯佳丽的挣扎与命运 An Analysis of Starlet’s Struggle and Fate 7、浅析海明威文学中的女性主义 Analysis on the Feminism in Hemingway’s Literature 8、浅析《无名的裘德》中裘德的悲剧生涯 The Analysis of Jude’s Tragic Life in “Jude the Obscure” 9、试探《简爱》中的哥特式女性主义 The exploration on the Gothic Feminism in “Jane Eyre” 10、浅析《呼啸山庄》中窗的意象 An Analysis of the image of window in “Wuthering Heights” 11、狄更斯风格在小说《大卫·科波菲尔》中的体现及其小说艺术特色 The writing style in “David Copperfiled” and the Beauty and relive of Dinchons’s writing 12、人物圣地亚哥与作者海明威的异同之我见 The Relationship Between the Character Santiago and Author Hemingway 13、哥特式特色在《呼啸山庄》中的体现 Gothic Features in Wuthering Hights 14、浅析《贵妇画像》中伊莎贝莎的悲剧成因 An Exploration of the Causes of Isabel’s Tragedy in The Portrait of a Lady 15《紫色》中白人女性与黑人女性社会地位的放映 The refection of social status of white women and black women in “The Color Purple”
建议选择文学方面的题材比较好些，我就是英语专业毕业生，当时我选择的是西方文化方面，材料比较少。但是如果要想拿到优秀论文建议最好别选文学，这个没有什么新意，而且也许会有许多人选材一样。若是不准备拿优秀论文，文学题材是一个不错的选择。
我才写完毕业论文，简直是折磨！我把我们系的题目给你，参考看看吧。我写的是文化类的。其实文学和文化类要比翻译和教育类好写得多，网上可以找到的参考资料也多。英美人文和历史研究：1，从跨文化的角度谈汉英思维及表达方式的差异2，论美国垮掉的一代3，美国牛仔的成功之路4，文艺复兴在英国文学史中的作用5，跨文化交际中英汉礼貌与面子6，中西方饮食文化的对比研究7，西方节日的变迁及文化内涵8，电影《喜福会》所表现的中西方文化差异（我就是这个题目）9，中美教育制度及教育理念的对比研究10，英汉称谓的差异及其文化内涵11，希腊神话对英美文化的影响12，英汉商标对英美文化的影响13，英语习语与西方文化14，浅谈英美姓氏的起源及文化内涵15，中美高等教育大众化路径的比较16，《阿甘正传》承载的美国青年文化17，《阿甘正传》美国传统价值观的呼唤与回归18，浅谈美国文化中的实用主义19，论美国宗教与政治20，《圣经》的文学性及其对中西文学的影响评述选题注意事项：1，选你自己感兴趣的题目，毕业论文是个浩大的工程，要是不能写自己想写的，相信我，在这漫长的写作时间里，你会相当痛苦的。2，题目不能太大，也不能太小，否则不好驾驭。最好是那种“从小角度看大问题”的题目。例如，我写喜福会这部电影，电影体现了中美文化差异，分别有婚姻观，家庭教育观等。但是我以一部电影为出发点，这个角度就比较小。话说中西方文化的差异实在太多了，但是我只从喜福会这部电影出发，所以范围就缩小了。再者，没什么人写这个电影，所以也不容易和别人雷同，不是被写滥了的题目。3，这个题目是好找资料的，毕竟是本科论文，不是研究生或是博士的论文，写作水平有限，平时最多写写几百字的作文忽然要写几千字，想必是非常困难的。所以内容不可能完完全全出自“自己”，于是就要大量的从网上，参考书上，图书馆搬来。所以最好就是找参考资料比较多的题目，切忌是参考，不是照搬，可以PARAPHRASE里面的内容到自己的论文。差不多就这些了，我觉得这几点是最重要的，如果你有几个拿不定主意的题目，可以找论文指导老师问问看，当时我开笔写论文前，都找老师问了，老师比较有经验，他应该可以给你很多建议。
中日韩语言艺术的异同
学习小语种的方式方法 论韩国语进阶教学 标准韩国语与韩国方言 韩国语实际应用 基础韩国语教学 韩国语与汉字的关系 等
1、关于“国际政治经济发展的特点” 2、浅析中东问题现状3、中国的外部困难和新领导集体面对的挑战4、中国大陆国际政治理论研究的若干问题5、环境问题的国际政治经济学分析6、态环境政治与当代国际关系7、美印军事合作及其制约因素
对于一个科研人员来说，如何选择科研课题，并无固定模式，总结科研选题的历史经验教训，可以概括出若干条原则：目的性原则。科研选题首先要解决的问题应当是“为什么”，目的性是选题工作的首要原则。选题最根本的目的是为了满足社会的需要，党的十三大曾明确指出，发展科学技术的首要任务就是振兴经济。当前，我国经济建设、社会发展正以更大规模向着广度深度进军，需要解决和研究的课题越来越新、越多、越复杂和越困难。比如能源问题、交通问题、粮食问题、管理、贸易问题、就业问题、人口问题、人权问题等等，解决其中一现实问题，就是一种贡献。科研一定要满足社会需要，才会有真正前途。与选题的目的性、需要性相联系的是课题的价值性。只有科研课题所要解决的问题是有价值的，比如经济价值、社会价值、理论价值、学术价值等，才会达到满足社会需要的目的。所以课题的价值性就成了衡量选题目的性、需要性的标准，在选题中，目的性原则、需要性原则、价值性原则是一致的。创新性原则。科研的本质就应当具有创造性，评审科研成果质量的最重要原则就是看成果有无创新，因此，科研选题从一开始就应当充分注意到这一点。国家对学位论文有明确要求，其中硕士论文应当有新见解，表现作者具有从事科研工作或者独立担负专门业务工作的能力。博士论文应当是创造性成果。科研选题切忌重复别人解决了的课题。所谓具有创新性的选题，指的是那些尚未解决或未完全解决的、预料经过研究可获得一定价值的新成果的课题。如新见解、新观点、新思想、新设计、新概念、新理论、新手段、新产品、新质量、新效益等。创新性具有新颖性、探索性、先进性、风险性等特点。它进一步体现了课题的需要性、价值性。选题中，贯彻创新性原则，关键在一个“新”字上。这种创新的课题在哪里？一般而言，在各种各样的矛盾点上，尤其是新旧之间的矛盾点。比如新事实与旧理论的矛盾，新理论与旧理论的矛盾，不同学科之间的矛盾。这些矛盾突出表现在：科学发展的前沿地带、学科之间空白地带、不同理论观点、学派相争论的地带，研究工作遇到挫折失败的地带等等。这需要科研人员目光敏锐，抓住线索，跟踪追击，以求突破。这些要求，对研究工作者来说，一般也是比较困难的。许多有经验的导师在指导学生科研时，常从这样三个方面入指导：第一、在局部性的课题上具有创新性。即解决一个多因素的大课题中的尚未解决的某一个因素，或者能作出深入透彻合理的分析见解；第二、在别人研究成果的基础上加以扩大，有自己的补充，新的见解或改进；第三、纠正别人的错误。总之，创新性可大可小，可难可易，如何选题，根据各人具体条件而定。
选什么主题不都可以吗，这有什么，你又不是法律翻译专业非得是翻译方面的，或者非得选某个方向。
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually （1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui " Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig"2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately （2） Misunderstandings treatment PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted 1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the 2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect Second, the behavior tools (methods) That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of 3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened This generally constitute a Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the
内容都好，何况题目！
我国象棋源远流长，历史悠久。但究其源头，众说纷纭，尚难定论。小时候瞎琢磨的劲头竟让我对这千年古玩爱不释手。总感觉它就是那一株窗前春睡的海棠，闲暇时，你可以信手轻轻的抚摸它醉人的容颜；它是台阶旁的一株蒲公英，可以让你有些疲惫的心灵，跟着它的花伞天远地阔的去徜徉和漫游。它是一片洁净的月光，为你清洗心灵，使受伤的思想得以痊愈。渐渐玩到深处，对它有了新的看法：人生如棋，棋若人生，社会为盘，人若子般，统筹全局，书写经营一个充满生机与活力的人生。车灵，马欢，相稳，士柔，炮精，卒脚踏实地，一步一个脚印，无畏前行。人生不也亦如此吗？棋盘上的车可谓是有勇有谋，活动自如，做事直来直去，长驱直入，棋盘上每一条直线都是他的轨道，他的战舰。进可底线抽杀攻无不克，退可看家护园守如磐石。从不拐弯抹角，威力无穷，往往得到老将的格外器重。任务都是他带领，组织，关键时刻以大局为重，舍命保帅。那么多优点值得我们学习一下。马在棋盘也是重要角色，总是他身先士卒，跳过楚河，汉界，拉开进攻的序幕。虽说万事开头难，但马总先打破对峙的局面。他总是和大家配合的默契，双马近乎完美的诠释团结就是力量的真理，马后炮更是映照了兄弟齐心齐力断金。但马往往会在最后会被咯马腿而失败。炮是我最爱的一个子，他隔山打牛的功夫把面前的拦路虎踏成垫脚石。人啊！也如此，换个思路，角度，拦路虎就会变成垫脚石。相很笨重但他们哥俩很忠诚的守护老将。他和士一样奉行一句话：有人杀我兄弟者，兄弟必杀之。高手间昏天地暗的杀到最后，往往都不败在最后的卒子上，都因为卒子攻心而忘，他似乎在警告人们再小的问题也不容忽视，否则后患无穷。是啊！象棋教会我们很多，人生如棋。年少轻狂的我们就像马一样欢，对所有的事情都有很大的热情，身先士卒，做什么事都抢着，争着。但年少的我们总会被现实这东西咯了马腿，停止不前，甚至颓废。稍微大些二十多岁，那时我们就是车，精力最旺盛，行动最敏捷，初涉社会，直来直去，很单纯，一股冲劲，真想一飞冲天。再大点三十几岁，就和炮差不多了，经历的事多了，困难多了，知道怎么战胜困难，利用困难了。四十多岁的时候就像象那样迟钝了，不如以前灵活，但稳了许多，像士一样知道了人不犯我我不犯人。等到年过半百的时候，就只能一步一步向前走了，老了走不动了和卒子一样脚踏实地一步一步，时光年龄也一去不回头。六十岁只能像士一样在家安度晚年了。七十多就是老将了，老态龙钟指挥下一辈战斗了。人生如棋，棋若人生，人生路途崎岖修远开局是童年，开始很美丽，过程很艰辛。随着时间的督促慢慢我们会失去很多东西，物质上的，精神上的。不要因为过早的失去贵重的东西而丧失信心，其实猛然回头会发现自己在失去的同时，也得到一种来之不易且不易发现的经验。那是成熟的经验。世间的事情不是一味的执着就能实现，只浑然走过不权衡得失，是不能从中获益的。做事不要太急，欲速则不达。留下一点空间容自己转身，留下一些时间让自己思考，不急不慢，不紧不松才是处世之道。棋盘上兄弟们奋力拼杀，最后斩帅而胜，似乎在告诉我们成功需要朋友，但更大的成功需要对手。朋友和对手是助你成功的两个不同的作用力。朋友的鼓励帮助时温馨的拉力，主动把你拽向光明。对手的竞争是推力、是压力、是动力。鞭策自己一定不要落后，激发斗志努力竞争。棋局上、人生中处处都是精心策划的意外，等着你小心翼翼地去踩。然后随之而来的是嘲弄、讥讽。你只能把憋得通红的脸蛋换成不屑一顾的微笑。因为没有时间让自己伤心，没有时间让自己难过。只能坚强的给自己创造机会，不断努力。不要一直沉浸在失利中。悲观，悲观可以因为那些永不妥协的乐观主义者，一定是经历过人生浮沉。只有真正被悲观磨洗过的人，才会拥有一种永不妥协的乐观精神。因为他知道太多的东西不掌握在自己的手中，所以这样的心拥有的是在苍凉映衬下的希望，是在苍凉之美萦绕于心之后能够表现出来的一种达观、信念。悲观之后就要乐观。每个人的一生都难免有缺憾和不如意，也许我们无力改变这个事实，但我们可以用这不如意的缺憾另一刻的幸福。人生就是这样。人生如棋，棋若人生，认真走好每一步，最后赢得辉煌成功。